![]() ![]() There is no excuse whatsoever for Avidemux taking 20+ minutes to render on an i7. Spoken like a true amateur who doesn't know whether to wind his butt or scratch his watch. ![]() I really liked it at first for it's simplicity until I found out these astonishing results. I can use a free editing program instead of goofing with Avidemux. I was trying to combine flash clips and it totally warped the audio and slowed down the whole video. Why would I ever touch Avidemux again? For simple editing? It can't even do that. Handbrake always encoded faster with smaller files - H264 high definition. I reproduced the results on a vast number of CPU's. I made sure to check Avidemux settings that it was using all cores. Not only that but Handbrake encoded the file SMALLER by a significant amount. I go and install Handbrake and it encodes the same file in under 4 minutes. This was done encoding a 16gb raw video file. I found with certain CPU's the times were WAY off.Īvidemux gave me a pathetic encode time of 24 minutes with a core i7 3770k w/ hyper-threading. Basically I was testing one computer's CPU vs another. I was using Avidemux a lot to test encoding times. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |